Why Young Voters Think Their Voice Doesn't Matter: Five Beliefs Holding Back a Generation
Persistent myths about voting power discourage South African youth from registering and participating in elections.
Young South Africans Grapple With Voting Myths That Keep Them From the Ballot Box
Zinhle Diko, 21, has never registered to vote. Her reasoning is straightforward: she believes her ballot will be swallowed by the machinery of politics, lost among millions of others, unable to shift anything that matters. “I honestly don’t think my vote will make a difference because I feel like things stay the same,” she said. “It feels like the same party will win again.”
Diko’s skepticism is not unusual. Young South Africans have grown up watching corruption scandals unfold, witnessing broken campaign promises, navigating unemployment, and experiencing repeated service-delivery failures. Politicians materialize during election season with food drives and promises, then seem to vanish once votes are counted. The cynicism is understandable. Yet beneath the surface of the most common reasons young people give for staying home on election day lies a set of assumptions that don’t quite withstand scrutiny.
The Electoral Commission of South Africa, Ground Work Collective leadership, and young voters themselves have identified five persistent myths that discourage youth participation. Understanding what these myths actually are, and what the evidence shows, reveals a more complicated picture than simple disengagement.
The belief that one vote cannot possibly matter ranks as perhaps the most widespread obstacle. Mbali Ntuli, chief executive of Ground Work Collective, frames the problem differently: the real danger emerges when millions of people hold this belief simultaneously. “When enough people believe that, it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy,” she said. “If millions of young people decide their vote is meaningless, they collectively hand enormous power to a much smaller group of voters who do turn out.” In local-government elections, where ward races often hinge on relatively small margins, this dynamic becomes especially consequential. Boitumelo Monaki, the Electoral Commission’s Gauteng spokesperson, emphasizes that democracy accumulates from individual votes. A single ballot may feel insignificant in isolation, but thousands of people making the same choice wield real power.
Another persistent claim holds that politics simply isn’t relevant to ordinary young people’s lives. This argument collapses under basic scrutiny. Every complaint about potholes, water cuts, electricity failures, rubbish collection, unsafe streets, or libraries that never seem to open reflects decisions made by government. Local-government elections matter particularly because municipalities directly control water, sanitation, refuse collection, local roads, parks, and public facilities. Ntuli reframes the issue plainly: “You don’t have to become a politician, but you should participate in deciding who governs your community.”
Young voters also frequently observe that politicians vanish after elections, treating their sudden visibility during campaign season as proof that engagement is performative. Diko has witnessed this pattern firsthand. “They promise change, better infrastructure, and improved service delivery and you’ll see food drives, T-shirts, and all these campaigns to get people to vote,” she said. “Then, when the elections are over, it feels like nothing changes.” Ntuli counters that silence is rarely interpreted as protest. Instead, it reads as disengagement. Those dissatisfied with performance can use elections to signal discontent, then sustain pressure afterwards through ward meetings, councillor contact, community organizations, and direct accountability questions.
A third obstacle involves the conviction that voting requires political expertise. Ntuli dismisses this barrier: “No one is expected to be a political expert before voting.” Being informed simply means gathering enough information to make a reasoned choice, whether that involves learning which candidates run in your ward, reviewing party platforms, or checking what parties have actually delivered where they already govern. Monaki agrees. “Voting doesn’t require someone to be a political expert. You don’t have to know every politician, every policy document or the entire history of coalition government,” she said. “You just need enough information to decide whose plans make sense to you.”
The claim that young people simply don’t care contradicts registration data. During the first registration weekend on 20 and 21 June, the Electoral Commission recorded 477,174 new registrations. Nearly 80 percent of those, or 379,767, came from young people. In the final registration weekend on 1 and 2 August, young people accounted for 485,757 registration transactions nationally, representing 26 percent of total registrations and 46 percent of all new registrations that weekend. Hundreds of thousands of young South Africans are actively entering the electoral process.
Twenty-three-year-old Tebogo Manamela exemplifies this shift. She once shared Diko’s conviction that her vote would matter little. “I realised maybe my vote could be that one vote needed among thousands that also want to see change,” she said. “My silence won’t make a change, but my vote will.” Eighteen-year-old Boitumelo Lekoane registered with more modest expectations. She wanted to experience voting firsthand, not because she has suddenly developed passionate political conviction. “I don’t really have a deep interest in politics itself, but I wanted to see what it’s like to cast my vote,” she said. She still worries one ballot won’t shift much, yet she registered anyway. This realistic portrait of youth voters matters: you can be skeptical and still participate. You can doubt the system and still cast a ballot.
The frustrations driving young people away from voting are genuine. Many have come of age in a country where youth unemployment remains severe, corruption is routine, and election promises sound familiar because they repeat endlessly. Registering to vote solves nothing overnight. Neither does voting itself. Dropping a ballot into a box doesn’t complete anyone’s democratic responsibility. But abstaining achieves nothing at all.
As Ntuli observes: “Whether you vote or not, someone will decide what your community looks like for the next five years.” The question becomes whether you want influence over who that person is. For more context on these barriers and how they affect young voters, see https://explain.co.za/2026/08/08/politics-isnt-for-me-five-myths-stopping-young-people-from-voting/. If you remain uncertain whether politics is “for you,” consider a simpler starting point: do the decisions politicians make affect your life? If the answer is yes, politics has already found you.
Q&A
What is the most widespread myth discouraging young South Africans from voting?
The belief that one vote cannot possibly matter. Mbali Ntuli explains that when millions hold this belief simultaneously, it becomes self-fulfilling; young people collectively hand power to a smaller group of voters who do turn out.
What evidence contradicts the claim that young people don't care about voting?
During the first registration weekend on 20 and 21 June, nearly 80 percent of 477,174 new registrations came from young people (379,767). In the final registration weekend on 1 and 2 August, young people accounted for 485,757 registration transactions, representing 26 percent of total registrations and 46 percent of all new registrations.
How do local government elections directly affect young people's daily lives?
Municipalities directly control water, sanitation, refuse collection, local roads, parks, and public facilities. Every complaint about potholes, water cuts, electricity failures, rubbish collection, unsafe streets, or libraries reflects decisions made by government.
What do Tebogo Manamela and Boitumelo Lekoane's experiences reveal about youth participation?
Manamela shifted from believing her vote wouldn't matter to realizing it could be the one vote needed among thousands seeking change. Lekoane registered despite modest expectations and lingering doubts, showing that skepticism and participation can coexist.